Claas Ranger 965

Claas Ranger 965, 965 PLUS, 970 – specs, opinions & photos

Looking for details about telehandlers Claas Ranger 965, 965 PLUS, 970? You'll find answers to questions such as:

  • What is the engine power of these models?
  • What is the maximum lift height?
  • What is the maximum lifting capacity of these telehandlers?

A technical sheet in table form makes comparing models simple, while user feedback will help you choose the right one.


Technical specifications of the telescopic handlers Claas Ranger 965, 965 PLUS, 970:

Claas Ranger 965
Claas Ranger 965 PLUS
Claas Ranger 970

Claas Ranger 965

  • Years of production: 1998-1999
  • Engine rated power (hp): 107KM
  • Driving speed (km/h): 30
  • Maximum lifting height (m): 7m
  • Maximum load capacity (kg): 3000kg

Claas Ranger 965 PLUS

  • Years of production: 1999-2001
  • Engine rated power (hp): 107KM
  • Driving speed (km/h): 30
  • Maximum lifting height (m): 7m
  • Maximum load capacity (kg): 3300kg

Claas Ranger 970

  • Years of production: 1996-1998
  • Engine rated power (hp): 107KM
  • Driving speed (km/h): 30
  • Maximum lifting height (m): 7m
  • Maximum load capacity (kg): 3000kg

For details and a comparison of the loaders, see the technical sheet below.

Advertisement


Data sheet for Claas Ranger 965, 965 PLUS, 970 telescopic handlers:

Comparison of technical parameters of telehandlers
Model Claas Ranger 965 Claas Ranger 965 PLUS Claas Ranger 970
Years of production 1998-1999 1999-2001 1996-1998
Engine manufacturer Perkins Perkins Perkins
Engine model / type 1004.4T 1004.40T 1004.4T
Engine rated power (hp) 107KM 107KM 107KM
Type of drive transmission W W W
Driving speed (km/h) 30 30 30
Maximum lifting height (m) 7m 7m 7m
Maximum load capacity (kg) 3000kg 3300kg 3000kg
Total weight (kg) 7500kg 7500kg 7500kg
Size of the wheels 15,5×24 15,5×24 15,5×24
Total length (cm) 505 505 505
Total width (cm) 235 235 235
Total height (cm) 245 245 245

Advertisement


Fuel consumption and user reviews of loaders Claas Ranger 965, 965 PLUS, 970:

Add your opinion:

Easy work 0.0 l/h
Medium work 0.0 l/h
Hard work 0.0 l/h

Opinions posted:

No opinions.

Average fuel consumption:

Easy - l/h
Medium - l/h
Hard - l/h

Advertisement